Will need to social course outline a person’s Education and Identity?
Firstly, the government has occur up with numerous initiatives that help bright but needy students to gain the highest levels of schooling and be successful. …
Examples include the work-study programs. These programs enable students to work, examination and at the same time pay their own school fees. There are also numerous scholarship programs in place to help needy students. The scholarship programs provide a certain amount of money to students who qualify for the criterions stipulated by the scholarships. see here
For this reason, it is incorrect to claim that social system can ascertain a person’s level of education. There have been numerous incidences where students from lower social program have outshined those from the middle and the upperclass to become the best. This, therefore, means that social class can never determine a person’s training unless the man or woman is not aggressive enough to achieve the highest level of instruction.
Social class is a product of social stratification that has grouped people in a certain hierarchy. The most common social classes are the upper training course, middle critique coaching system and the lower review training course. Since time in memorial, the social course had a close relationship with schooling more
in such a way that people from the upper method receive the best education and learning and those from the lower application the worst quality of instruction. This has been facilitated by the constant increase in the cost of instruction. Most parents from poor communities have not been able to take their children to the best schools. For this reason, bright but poor students have lacked the chance to pursue their education and learning to the highest level due to monetary constraints. This has changed with time, and process no longer defines one’s training.
Apart from education, I also strongly are convinced that program does not outline one’s identity. Identity is being who someone is not withstanding their study course or level of schooling. Identity is something personal, and it cannot be defined by a person’s culture, the level of schooling, social course, sex or religion. etc
It is rather the one thing that makes someone be who they are and stand out as different or unique. Some people could want to identify as poor or underprivileged simply because they belong to the middle or the lower program. These people are wrong because an identity is something bigger than social training course. The people who let their social practice figure out their identity are misplaced and they will doubtless have to seek to better grasp themselves. In as much as peoples method may perhaps change from lower evaluation course to upper method, their identity is something that will not change. This is because a persons identity is something that is inborn. Therefore, people most certainly will have to never let social program find out their training or identity but rather strive to be themselves and achieve the best in life irrespective of their social training model. When someone understands their see and achieve the best level of education and learning irrespective of their social course, they will certainly be happy. This is because they will be comfortable with who they are and strive to make other people happy as effectively.